Pseudobelus bipartitus
No picture of Pseudobelus bipartitus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Pseudobelus bipartitus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- PseudobelusPBDB
- Diet
- carnivorePBDB, for Cephalopoda
- Life habit
- nektonicPBDB, for Belemnitida
- Motility
- fast-movingPBDB, for Cephalopoda
- Vision
- well-developedPBDB, for Cephalopoda
- Environment
- marinePBDB, for Cephalopoda
Time the record covers
At least 4.4 million years on record.
The record covers at least 137.05 Mya to 132.6 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 154.8 Mya to 125.77 Mya.
32 occurrences of Pseudobelus bipartitus on record, most of them in the Early Cretaceous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
32 occurrencesThese are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
5 formations
- Palnatokes Bjerg Formation · Wollaston Forland Group18
- Szentivánhegy Limestone Formation4
- Mogyorósdomb Limestone Formation3
- Pieniny Limestone Formation1
- Štramberk Limestone Formation1
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Pseudobelus bipartitus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 5 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Pseudobelus bipartitus and its relatives
Early CretaceousWhere Pseudobelus bipartitus and its relatives were recorded in the Early Cretaceous.
Found in the same rock
163 taxa- Duvalia lata7 sites
- Lytoceras7 sites
- Hibolithes5 sites
- Buchia4 sites
- Neolissoceras grasianum4 sites
- Olcostephanus4 sites
- Spiticeras4 sites
- Berriasellinae3 sites
- Duvalia3 sites
- Kilianiceras3 sites
- Nikitinoceras3 sites
- Polyptychites3 sites
- Pygope3 sites
- Antinomia sima2 sites
- Berriasibelus2 sites
- Berriasibelus conicus2 sites
- Holaster2 sites
- Kilianella2 sites
- Kilianella roubaudiana2 sites
- Lamellaptychus2 sites
- Luppovella (Luppovella) superba2 sites
- Malbosiceras2 sites
- Nikitinoceras (Nikitinoceras)2 sites
- Nucleata bouei2 sites
The Paleobiology Database records 27 sites for Pseudobelus bipartitus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
8 references- The Early Cretaceous of north-east Greenland: a crossroads of belemnite migration18
- Integrated isotope and biostratigraphy of a Lower Cretaceous section from the Bakony Mountains (Transdanubian Range, Hungary): A new Tethyan record of the Weissert event7
- Les Duvaliidae PAVLOW (Belemnitida) du Crétacé inférieur francais2
- Lower Cretaceous belemnites of Štramberk klippen (Czech Republic): Implications for geological history of the outer Western Carpathians1
- Ammonite-supported microfossil and nannoconid stratigraphy of the Tithonian–Hauterivian limestones in selected sections of the Branisko Succession, Pieniny Klippen Belt (Poland)1
- Braquiopodos del Hauteriviense de Fortuna (Prov. Murcia, Espana)1
- Le Crétacé inférieur de l'arc subalpin de Castellane entre l'Asse et le Var: Stratigraphy et Sédimentologie1
- Jura Vaudois et Neuchatelois1
Each of the 32 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Pseudobelus bipartitus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Pseudobelus bipartitus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Pseudobelus bipartitus was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itPseudobelus through timeFormations of the Early CretaceousThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. (Blainville 1827)