Vulpes rueppelli

No picture of Vulpes rueppelli was found. Wikidata was searched and had none. Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Vulpes rueppelli itself, so it was not used. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Vulpes rueppelli firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Also called
Ruuppells foxPBDB

Time the record covers

At most 1.7 million years on record.

Every occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 1.8 Mya and 129 ka, and nothing in the dating separates them, so that window is what the record shows rather than a span.

Pleistocene — about 3 of 3 occurrencesPleistoceneHolocene — about 0 of 3 occurrences1.8–1.8 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences1.8–1.7 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences1.7–1.6 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences1.6–1.5 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences1.5–1.5 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences1.5–1.4 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences1.4–1.3 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences1.3–1.2 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences1.2–1.1 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences1.1–1.1 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences1.1–997 ka Mya — about 0.1 occurrences997 ka–920 ka Mya — about 0.1 occurrences920 ka–843 ka Mya — about 0.1 occurrences843 ka–767 ka Mya — about 0.1 occurrences767 ka–690 ka Mya — about 0.2 occurrences690 ka–613 ka Mya — about 0.2 occurrences613 ka–537 ka Mya — about 0.2 occurrences537 ka–460 ka Mya — about 0.2 occurrences460 ka–383 ka Mya — about 0.2 occurrences383 ka–307 ka Mya — about 0.2 occurrences307 ka–230 ka Mya — about 0.2 occurrences230 ka–153 ka Mya — about 0.2 occurrences153 ka–77 ka Mya — about 0.1 occurrences2.3 Mya0 Mya

3 occurrences of Vulpes rueppelli on record, most of them in the Pleistocene. The Paleobiology Database records this as a living group, and the chart stops with its fossils rather than at the present. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

3 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Vulpes rueppelli and its relatives

Pleistocene

Where Vulpes rueppelli and its relatives were recorded in the Pleistocene.

Found in the same rock

59 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 3 sites for Vulpes rueppelli, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 3 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content1

Structured light scan

Licence
In Copyright
Commercial use
cannot be read from the licence given — check the record
Specimen
Vulpes rueppelli · FMNH:Mammals:106368

No picture of Vulpes rueppelli was found. Wikidata was searched and had none.

Wikipedia has a picture filed under this name, but nothing tied it to Vulpes rueppelli itself, so it was not used.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Vulpes rueppelli firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Schinz 1825