Chelotriton paradoxus

No picture of Chelotriton paradoxus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Chelotriton paradoxus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

On record

Recorded, not inferred
Sits inside
ChelotritonPBDB
Diet
carnivorePBDB, for Temnospondyli
Life habit
amphibiousPBDB, for Temnospondyli
Motility
actively mobilePBDB, for Temnospondyli
Environment
brackish,freshwater,terrestrialPBDB, for Tetrapoda

Time the record covers

At least 14 million years on record.

The record covers at least 23.04 Mya to 8.725 Mya. No occurrence read is dated outside 27.3 Mya to 5.333 Mya.

Oligocene — about 2 of 11 occurrencesOligoceneMiocene — about 9 of 11 occurrencesMiocenePliocene — about 0 of 11 occurrences28–27 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences27–26 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences26–26 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences26–25 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences25–24 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences24–23 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences23–22 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences16–16 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences16–15 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences15–14 Mya — about 0.9 occurrences14–13 Mya — about 0.4 occurrences13–12 Mya — about 0.7 occurrences12–12 Mya — about 1 occurrence12–11 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences11–10 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences10–9.4 Mya — about 0.5 occurrences9.4–8.7 Mya — about 0.6 occurrences8.7–7.9 Mya — about 1 occurrence7.9–7.1 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences7.1–6.4 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences6.4–5.6 Mya — about 0.2 occurrences5.6–4.8 Mya — about 0.1 occurrences23.04 Mya8.725 Mya27.8 Mya4.8 Mya

11 occurrences of Chelotriton paradoxus on record, most of them in the Miocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

11 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

3 formations

Gaverdovsky — 44.61°N, 40.03°EVille — 50.90°N, 6.45°EUpper Freshwater Molasse — 48.66°N, 10.23°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Chelotriton paradoxus has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 7 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.

Chelotriton paradoxus and its relatives

Miocene

Where Chelotriton paradoxus and its relatives were recorded in the Miocene.

Found in the same rock

358 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 10 sites for Chelotriton paradoxus, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

9 references

Each of the 11 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Chelotriton paradoxus was found. Wikipedia, Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.

Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Chelotriton paradoxus, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.

No 3D scan of Chelotriton paradoxus was found in Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Pomel 1853