Ctenomys kraglievichi
No picture of Ctenomys kraglievichi was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is. GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Ctenomys kraglievichi, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
On record
Recorded, not inferred- Sits inside
- CtenomysPBDB
- Diet
- herbivorePBDB, for Ctenomys
- Life habit
- fossorialPBDB, for Ctenomys
- Motility
- actively mobilePBDB, for Osteichthyes
- Environment
- terrestrialPBDB, for Eutheria
Time the record covers
At least 645 thousand years on record.
The record covers at least 774 ka to 129 ka. No occurrence read is dated outside 2.58 Mya to 11.7 ka.
5 occurrences of Ctenomys kraglievichi on record, most of them in the Pleistocene. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.
When
5 occurrences- Pleistocene100%
These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.
Found in
2 formations
Loading coastlines…
The named rock units Ctenomys kraglievichi has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed. 3 occurrences have no formation on record, which is common for older literature.
Ctenomys kraglievichi and its relatives
PleistoceneWhere Ctenomys kraglievichi and its relatives were recorded in the Pleistocene.
Found in the same rock
59 taxa- Ctenomys avitus2 sites
- Glossotherium2 sites
- Lestodon armatus2 sites
- Akodon (Akodon) azarae1 site
- Akodon iniscatus1 site
- Callichthys1 site
- Catagonus1 site
- Ceratophrys1 site
- Cervidae1 site
- Chaetophractus villosus1 site
- Chloephaga1 site
- Choephaga <sp.1>1 site
- Choephaga <sp.2>1 site
- Corydoras1 site
- Ctenomys rusconii1 site
- Doedicurus1 site
- Eutatus seguini1 site
- Galea1 site
- Glyptodon1 site
- Glyptodon clavipes1 site
- Gomphotheriidae1 site
- Hemiauchenia1 site
- Herpailurus1 site
- Hippidion1 site
The Paleobiology Database records 5 sites for Ctenomys kraglievichi, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.
This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.
Entered from
4 references- An exceptionally well-preserved fossil rodent of the South American subterranean clade Ctenomys (Rodentia, Ctenomyidae). Phylogeny and adaptive profile2
- An extremely large saber-tooth cat skull from Uruguay (late Pleistocene–early Holocene, Dolores Formation): body size and paleobiological implications1
- Late Cenozoic mammal bio-chronostratigraphy in southwestern Buenos Aires Province, Argentina1
- Additions to the knowledge on fossil rodents of Uruguay (Mammalia: Rodentia)1
Each of the 5 occurrences read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Entries link to doi.org where the Paleobiology Database holds an identifier, and to its own record where it does not. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.
Media and terms
Media content0
No picture of Ctenomys kraglievichi was found. Wikidata and iDigBio were searched and had none.
Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.
GBIF was asked, and what came back is not recorded: nothing, or a picture this site could not tie to Ctenomys kraglievichi, or no answer at all. This entry cannot say which.
No 3D scan of Ctenomys kraglievichi was found in Sketchfab.
Smithsonian Open Access and MorphoSource were not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.
This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.
Keep going
What may have been alongside itCtenomys through timeFormations of the PleistoceneThe world it lived on
Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0. Rusconi 1930