Auracariacites australis

No picture of Auracariacites australis was found. Wikidata was searched and had none. iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Auracariacites australis firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed. Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

Time the record covers

At most 2.1 million years on record.

The one occurrence read is dated to somewhere between 143.1 Mya and 141 Mya, which is a dating window rather than a span.

Late Jurassic — about 0 of 1 occurrenceEarly Cretaceous — about 1 of 1 occurrenceEarly Cretaceous143–143 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences143–143 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences143–143 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences143–143 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences143–143 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences143–143 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences143–142 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences142–142 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences142–142 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences142–142 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences142–142 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences142–142 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences142–142 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences142–142 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences142–142 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences142–142 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences142–141 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences141–141 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences141–141 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences141–141 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences141–141 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences141–141 Mya — about 0.0 occurrences143.6 Mya140.5 Mya

1 occurrence of Auracariacites australis on record, most of them in the Early Cretaceous. Bar height is expected occurrences, not a count: each fossil is spread across the span it is dated to, so a tall narrow bar means tight dating and a low wide one means loose.

When

1 occurrences

These are dates about fossils, not the animal: the record can only begin after it arose and end before it died out, so either end may reach further. Shares are expected occurrences: a fossil dated to a span is counted partly in each period it straddles. More on what this infers.

Found in

1 formation

Rabekke — 55.05°N, 14.80°E

Loading coastlines…

The named rock units Auracariacites australis has been recovered from, largest first. Drawn where the rock is now, not where it formed.

Auracariacites australis and its relatives

Early Cretaceous

Where Auracariacites australis and its relatives were recorded in the Early Cretaceous.

Found in the same rock

26 taxa

The Paleobiology Database records 1 site for Auracariacites australis, and this reads all of them. The number is how many of those sites it was catalogued from too. The 24 sharing the most are listed.

This is not a list of everything alive at the time. It is only what has come out of the same ground as this animal and been written down.

Entered from

1 reference

Each of the 1 occurrence read was entered from one of these publications, ordered by how many each accounts for. This is not a search for papers mentioning the name. Each entry links to doi.org. Relayed as the Paleobiology Database holds them, not checked against what they resolve to.

Media and terms

Media content0

No picture of Auracariacites australis was found. Wikidata was searched and had none.

iDigBio and GBIF were not searched: the Paleobiology Database does not place Auracariacites australis firmly enough to tell it from something else bearing the same name, and a search on the name alone returns whichever of them was photographed.

Wikipedia and Smithsonian Open Access did not answer, so this is what the others held rather than everything there is.

No 3D scan of Auracariacites australis was found in MorphoSource and Sketchfab.

Smithsonian Open Access was not reached for this taxon, so this list is what the others held rather than everything there is.

This is what the site found, which is not the same as what exists.

Keep going

What may have been alongside itFormations of the Early CretaceousThe world it lived on

Occurrence data from the Paleobiology Database, CC BY 4.0.